第五密度新人類

Esu談憤怒和連接
By Esu
傳導：Jess
原文地址：
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Jess_Anthony_29/Esu-Speaks-on-Anger-and-Connection.shtml

Esu Speaks on Anger and Connection
By
Oct 16, 2010 - 11:10:02 AM

I asked Esu about anger last night and this is what I heard:
昨晚我詢問Esu關於憤怒，這是我所聽到的：

10-15-10

Esu, what is anger? How do we deal with anger in ourselves and in other people? How do we approach situations that reject what we feel is truth? How do we communicate with others who don't want to connect? How do we teach? I ask these questions because our purpose is to guide others and work to develop awareness.

Jess：Esu，什麼是憤怒？我們如何處理在我們自己和他人之中的憤怒？對於拒絕我們認為真實之事的情況，我們如何開始？我們如何與不希望連接的他人相交流？我們如何教導？我詢問這些問題，因為我們的目的是引導他人和為發展意識而工作。

Jess, let's talk about these issues. There is a misunderstanding that anger is righteous. Anger is an emotional reaction that is a regurgitation of memories and past experiences. People feel thwarted or disappointed because something they felt should happen didn't. Their body chemistry causes them to lose rational focus and begin to act spontaneously with little consideration of what is most practical and productive. They want to feel righteous, but they can't by clinging to habitual thoughts.

Esu：Jess，讓我們談談這些問題。有一個誤解——憤怒是正當的。憤怒是一種情緒反應，是一種過往經驗和記憶的回流。人們感到阻撓或失望，因為他們感覺應該發生的一些事情沒有發生。他們的身體化學導致他們失去了理智焦點，開始自發行動，而幾乎不考慮什麼是最實際和富有成效的。他們想要覺得理所當然，但由於執著于習慣思維，他們不能如此。

The result of anger is more anger. Acts determined by feelings of anger generally fall short of the goal that is at the cause of the anger in the first place. The only way to defuse the mental block that anger leads to is to counter the attack with an unexpected non-response. This is not saying be passive. This is not saying ignore the attack. This is saying use a reasoned reply that does not aggravate another person's feeling of lack or failure. For anger is built on a sense of failure. Anger is a support system for inadequacy.

憤怒的結果是更多憤怒。被憤怒的感覺所決定的行為，通常會落至缺少目標——這目標導致了最初的憤怒。拆除憤怒導致的精神障礙的唯一方法，是使用意外的“毫無反應”來對抗攻擊。這不是在說消極被動。這不是在說忽視攻擊。這是在說，使用一種理性的回應——它不會加重另一個人缺乏或失敗的感覺。憤怒建立在一種失敗的感覺上。憤怒是“不足”的支援系統。

Remember those Biblical statements I am quoted as saying: "Let he who is without sin case the first stone." "Turn the other cheek." "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's; render unto God the things that are God's." Don't buy into emotional attacks. They feed attitudes and perceptions that are not God's.

記得那些聖經中的說法，如同我引用的：“讓無罪之人拿起第一塊石頭。”“轉過另一邊臉。”“凱撒的物當歸給凱撒，上帝的物當歸給上帝。”不要引入情感攻擊。它們餵養那不是上帝的看法和觀念。

God is not without emotion. God is love and there can be nothing greater than the feeling he has for each of you. But feelings used without the component of thinking are misguided. Man's feelings are colored by his experiences and his teachings. He cannot trust them unless he is certain they are also God's feelings. God states bold facts, but he doesn't make fun of part of his creation. He sees the error of these conceptions and he is disappointed when they turn against his truth.

上帝不是沒有感情。上帝是愛，比起他對你們每個人的感情，沒有什麼是更偉大的了。但是，沒有思想組成部分而使用的感情是誤入歧途。人類的感情被他的經歷和他的教導染色。他不能信任它們，除非他確定它們也是上帝的感情。上帝規定了醒目的事實，但他不會取笑他部分的創造。他看見這些觀念的誤差，並且當它們轉而對抗他的真理時，他很失望。

But even in his disappointment, he offers a chance for these ones to change. He allows them to view the situation in their terms and offers a solution that they can understand. He doesn't make fun of his creation because they don't follow his ideas. He does point out the error of what they believe and he offers alternative directions they can choose to go. When they don't make this choice, he provides others until there is only one choice left. He speaks to them in whatever way he can to break through.

但是，甚至是在他的失望中，他也給予一個機會來讓那些個體改變。他允許他們以他們的觀點來考慮這個情況，並提供他們能夠理解的解決辦法。他不會因為他們不遵循他的思想，就取笑他的創造物。他指出他們所相信之處的失誤，並給予他們能選擇前行的可選方向。當他們沒有做此選擇，他會提供其他選擇——直到只剩下一個選擇。他以他能夠突破的任何方式對他們講話。

You speak with others calmly and with substance. You don't make fun of their lack of perception or awareness. You accept the fact that they have been taught one set of ideas, and that they are angry now because their expectations are not coming true. You find ways to speak to them that will challenge their perceptions instead of antagonizing them further. You present information to them that you are certain is correct, and you do it in a way that provides a sense of support for their own ability to grasp a new idea. You don't force feed ideas. You don't speak of facts they have no way to understand. You approach a dialogue with them in whatever channel is possible and allows them to learn. You don't presume your method is what they need. You don't presume you are superior because you have more information. You have no way of knowing what a person's life path is unless you ask about it. You can criticize their choices or their attitudes only when you know why they have chosen them.

你用本質平靜地與他人講話。你沒有取笑他們不足的感知或意識。你接受這個事實——他們已被教導一系列思想；他們現在是憤怒的，因為他們的期待沒有成真。你設法對他們講話，這將質詢他們的感知，而不是使他們更久地對抗。你給他們展現你確定是正確的資訊，從某種程度上看，你做這個提供了一種支援的感覺，以讓他們自己的能力去領會一個新想法。你沒有強行灌入想法。你沒有談論他們無法理解的事實。你在所有可能的頻道開始與他們的對話，並允許他們學習。你沒有認定你的方法就是他們所需要的。你沒有認定，因為你有更多的資訊，你就是高等的。你無法知道一個人的生命之路是什麼，除非你詢問它。只有當你知道他們為什麼選擇它們時，你才能評價他們的選擇或他們的看法。

The fact that you have feelings of anger is no reason to blame others. You look at what is causing you to be angry and you remove the memories of experiences in you that have caused this block in the first place. Once you have removed your own blocks and emotional preconceptions, you can speak to what your experiences have been in removing them. Others may learn from your example, or they may not.

你已有憤怒感覺的事實，是沒有理由責怪他人的。你考慮什麼正在導致你的憤怒，你移除你內部經驗的記憶——它導致了首要的堵塞。一旦你移除了你自己的堵塞和情感偏見，你就能在移除它們時，證明你的經驗曾是什麼。其他人可能會向你的例子學習，或者不會。

Work to make changes in a positive way. See problems and desire to change them. This is commitment to purpose. This is not anger; this is dedication and resolve. This gets more accomplished than falling into habitual patterns because of anger and emotional flare ups.

以正面的方式做出改變，據此來行事。看見問題並要求改變它們。這是對意願的承諾。這不是憤怒；這是奉獻和決心。比起因憤怒和情感爆發而落入習慣模式，這會獲得更多實現。

Esu